A senator has filed an ammendment on the AI states regulation moratorium, https://x.com/news_jul/status/1939861654365511907 . We'll see tomorrow whether it passes. The base rate for a vote-a-rama ammendment passing is 8%-25% (depending on the year), but this one seems more likely than most; perhaps with Democrats united and Republicans fractured.
Please be more careful in language and fact-checking. The US congress is not considering an 'AI moratorium' in its budget bill; it is considering a ban on states regulating AI. And the linked article did not say that 'Israel killed 14 more nuclear scientists.' Instead, 14 was the total tally of scientists killed since the conflict started. If I continue to see more things like this I will not consider this a trustworthy source of information.
Hey, thanks for pointing out that we just referred to it as an "AI moratorium" in the summary and not as an "AI states regulation moratorium"; I've now changed that (though we did give the full description in the relevant section). I've also edited the 14 scientists item.
Ultimately however I think we'll still make mistakes like that in the near future. Some of them are caught during copy editing, some in the comments here. But at our current level of ressources I see us as providing a valuable signal that is still valuable even if it doesn't reach 100% accuracy. We do take care to link to the sources so that people who are interested in a particular topic can double check stuff though.
A senator has filed an ammendment on the AI states regulation moratorium, https://x.com/news_jul/status/1939861654365511907 . We'll see tomorrow whether it passes. The base rate for a vote-a-rama ammendment passing is 8%-25% (depending on the year), but this one seems more likely than most; perhaps with Democrats united and Republicans fractured.
Please be more careful in language and fact-checking. The US congress is not considering an 'AI moratorium' in its budget bill; it is considering a ban on states regulating AI. And the linked article did not say that 'Israel killed 14 more nuclear scientists.' Instead, 14 was the total tally of scientists killed since the conflict started. If I continue to see more things like this I will not consider this a trustworthy source of information.
Hey, thanks for pointing out that we just referred to it as an "AI moratorium" in the summary and not as an "AI states regulation moratorium"; I've now changed that (though we did give the full description in the relevant section). I've also edited the 14 scientists item.
Ultimately however I think we'll still make mistakes like that in the near future. Some of them are caught during copy editing, some in the comments here. But at our current level of ressources I see us as providing a valuable signal that is still valuable even if it doesn't reach 100% accuracy. We do take care to link to the sources so that people who are interested in a particular topic can double check stuff though.