Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Max Räuker's avatar

> As well as the risks associated with open sourcing powerful AI systems, DeepSeek poses a problem for those calling for the US to race ahead on AI against China, in a dash to superintelligence. Those calling for this, such as Leopold Aschenbrenner, have argued that the safest scenario is where the US has, maintains, and grows a “healthy lead” over China. This now looks significantly less tenable.

Not sure how you quantify "significantly less tenable", but

1.) isn't the difference in compute available still the largest factor, even assuming faster algorithmic convergence

2.) o1/r1 are far from superintelligent systems

3.) I still expect it to make a decisive difference if you can deploy 10 vs. 1000 vs. 1000000 instances of your superintelligent system

Expand full comment
Noah's avatar

I've really enjoyed reading these over the past while. Thanks so much for all your hard work.

I had a, probably not so significant question, about the "natural deterioration" thing.

In another part of the update, in the Europe part, talking about undersea cables rupturing, somewhere between 100-200 a year, would this rupture fit into one of these "natural deterioration" breaks? and was the 100-200 a figure for Europe, or globally?

Not super important question, just curious. If you had any places I could read more if you didn't wanna answer feel free to link them, too.

Thanks again!

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts