Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Olli Järviniemi's avatar

Thanks for a great newsletter, I appreciate your weekly writings.

Two minor points of feedback:

"Following up on previous reports, the WSJ reports that Western officials speculate that two incidents earlier this year attempting to ship incendiary devices into planes in Leipzig and Birmingham might have been intended as test runs for a US attack. "

As someone who has not followed this incident closely, it took me a bit of time to realize that this is *Russia* doing a test run in preparation for a US attack.

"He was also once involved in a heated argument with Matt Gaetz on the House floor."

I was here left confused about the significance of this event ("why are you telling me this?"). But I lack a lot of context (being a non-US citizen and everything), so maybe other readers benefit from this.

Expand full comment
[insert here] delenda est's avatar

That last link is exactly why I still sometimes doubt AGW, because some of its high priests are so utterly lacking in credibility and are plainly bad faith actors.

The most likely path is plainly that Trump II is like Trump I: overall reducing greenhouses gases through deregulation, except the effect with Trump II will be mediated through nuclear whilst Trump I was through (fracked) gas.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts